I can't be held responsible for the things I say or write...

3.24.2006

chill out hippies part 2

so i got this forward yesterday of a video link about the plane that crashed into the pentagon on 9/11.

http://www.pentagonstrike.co.uk/flash.htm#Main

so, to begin with, everyone is now an expert on what happens right before, during and right after a plane crashes into a military building with ten sides. the video will take you through the common conspiracy angles such as "where is the fuselage" and "it didn't sound like a Boeing 757" or "I an anarchist and this how i'm getting back at my parents by putting safety pins through my earring holes and using safety pins instead of buttons...who's more punk than me?"

anyway, first question: without any research whatsoever, can anyone tell me the difference off the top of your head about the differences in airplane size?

more directly, can anyone tell me what a plane sounds like when it about to crash into something?

according to "eye witness accounts", it sounded like a missile. this was a big big deal of the video producers. a missile. a fucking missile. can anyone tell me what a large piece of metal filled with enough gallons of fuel to make it across the united states is extremely similar to? if you said missile, i would have to agree. missile go really fast and explode when they come in contact with object...sounds like what happens whenever a plane runs into a random object such as the pentagon.

i can't believe this was a major point of the video.

moving on, they start to show pictures of the holes in the pentagon that look like a tank had driven through them. let me state right now that i am definitely not an expert on the pentagon crash. the pictures very well could have been from the pentagon...but i'm going to go ahead and say no fucking way. if you look at the white work suits the cleaners or whoever are wearing or the wreckage of whatever building is attempting to be the pentagon, you might, as i was, reminded of my 6th grade spanish textbook, Bienvenidos!

I'm not buying those pictures, no f-ing way. that looks more like a scene where arrows were redacted along with the the characterizations such as "edificio" or "constructador".

now, the part i have "trouble" discounting, at least beyond saying such up you fucking hippies, is the confiscation of the surveillance videos from the gas station and the VDOT cameras....the videos point: "these videos have never been released" oooooohhhhhhhhhhhhhh. that's a scary thought there.

but anyway, now i find myself thinking, what is the purpose of this video. based on the link, it appears it comes from the UK, or maybe and most likely that is merely the site hosting it. regardless, that's a major knock on the credibility in my mind...afterall, i was here when this happened. i remember the smoke coming up from the pentagon while i was watching from my roof. i remember driving by the pentagon and seeing a gigantic hole in the side. the thought that we did that to ourselves was not one that entered my mind.

secondly, we're talking about the pentagon. out of all of the planes that crashed that day, to me at least, it seems like the pentagon has been the one most brushed over. there is a tv show going on right now about the passengers aboard the plane that crashed in Pennsylvania and you can't go 3 days without some reference to the WTC. point being: why are the hippies making such a big deal out of this? even if we did use a "missile" to blow up part of the pentagon, wouldn't there be at least some reason that would have been leaked by now?

wouldn't someone else in the world have raised this at all?

but yeah, make the video, send the video, believe the video, die in a "freak" skiing or car accident or have a sudden heart attack or whatever...

f off hippies...

and fuck you bert

2 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

minor misunderstanding about prefixes: "penta" means five-sided, "deca" means ten-sided.

semantics in '06!

1:45 PM

 
Anonymous Anonymous said...

She is sooo smart.

4:58 PM

 

Post a Comment

<< Home